|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|



Jim_H wrote:?

Cheerycow wrote:Jim_H wrote:?
Jim H: I believe RedRoxx is referring to the photo of the bear cub that is running from the camera.
Redroxx: thanks for the link...those 140 or so photos were very useful to see. Finally we can get a feel for the severity of the burn in some areas. I was most anxious to see the Rustler/Barfoot/Onion saddle burns.




Jim_H wrote:Cheerycow wrote:Jim_H wrote:?
Jim H: I believe RedRoxx is referring to the photo of the bear cub that is running from the camera.
Redroxx: thanks for the link...those 140 or so photos were very useful to see. Finally we can get a feel for the severity of the burn in some areas. I was most anxious to see the Rustler/Barfoot/Onion saddle burns.
I knew that. I was alluding to the fact that the animal is alive, and well enough to run from humans. If the heartbreak stems from the fire's affect on the animal by the assumed destruction of it's habitat, why are we so upset over the affects of the fire resulting from human mismanagement, but are ourselves or as a society, unwilling to see fire used regularly to maintain a fire=dependent ecosystem? A bear running from a large, hot, and probably very rare and therefore unnaturally destructive fire in it's territory in this part of Arizona is not something that breaks my heart. A truck load of fire boys pouncing on every little ignition to suppress it, and then allow fuels to build up to obscenely high levels, that breaks my heart.



joe bartels wrote:http://hikearizona.com/map.php?QX=773








RedRoxx44 wrote:Not sure about the Chiricahuas now as . . . I'll probably be depressed by what I would see.

Return to Fire & Area Closures
Moderator: HAZ - Moderators
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
| Q: Wanna browse with less Ads? A: Simply login 37,000 members since 1996...
|