Welcome to the HAZ Forum
Username
Password
Stay on Help
Outdoors Related General
Linked Descriptions None
UN Study Shows Biodiversity Loss
Hiking Related – Not Trail Specific

UN Study Shows Biodiversity Loss

Postby Rob del Desierto » Apr 29 2010 2:53 pm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science_and_ ... 092320.stm

No real surprise here. Biodiversity is decreasing at a constant or increasing rate.
World's 2010 nature target 'will not be met'
By Richard Black

Environment correspondent, BBC News Burning trees in Brazil (Image: PA) Threats to biodiversity, such as habitat loss, are still on the increase

The world's governments will not meet their internationally-agreed target of curbing the loss of species and nature by 2010, a major study has confirmed.

Virtually all species and ecosystems show continued decline, while pressures on nature are increasing, it concludes.

Published in the journal Science, the study confirms what conservationists have known for several years.

The 2010 target was adopted in 2002, but the scientists behind this study say implementation has been "woeful".

"Our analysis shows that governments have failed to deliver on the commitments they made in 2002," said research leader Stuart Butchart, from the UN Environment Programme's World Conservation Monitoring Centre (Unep-WCMC) and BirdLife International.

"Biodiversity is still being lost as fast as ever, and we have made little headway in reducing the pressures on species, habitats and ecosystems."

Unep chief scientist Joseph Alcamo added: "Since 1970, we have reduced animal populations by 30%, the area of mangroves and seagrasses by 20% and the coverage of living corals by 40%.

"These losses are clearly unsustainable."
Growing gap

The study combined more than 30 indicators of how species and ecosystems are changing.
Continue reading the main story

Everyone, from individuals to businesses, must act now to save all life on Earth before we reach breaking point

Jean-Christophe Vie IUCN Richard Black's Earth Watch blog

These encompass plants and animals from land and sea.

Very few of the indicators gave any hint that biodiversity loss was decreasing at all.

Meanwhile, measures of threat - such as loss of habitat, climate change and colonisation by harmful non-native species - were virtually all increasing.

Policies to restrict the threats to biodiversity are simply not up to the job, the authors argue.

"Although nations have put in place some significant policies to slow biodiversity declines, these have been woefully inadequate, and the gap between the pressures on biodiversity and the responses is getting ever wider," said Dr Butchart.

While about 12% of land is now under some kind of protection, not all of it is effectively managed.

And less than 1% of the world's oceans is protected.
'No excuse'

Conservationists hope that laying the sheer scale of the issue before governments will induce them to take tougher steps in the near future.

"We can no longer use the excuse that we don't know enough about the loss of diversity of life on our planet," said Jean-Christophe Vie, deputy head of the Species Programme at the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN).

"The role of governments is paramount; but the magnitude and rate of loss of biodiversity means that everyone, from individuals to businesses, must act now to save all life on Earth before we reach breaking point."

Governments will review their failure to meet the 2010 target, and probably set new ones, at the UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) summit in Nagoya, Japan, in October.

New targets are likely to be directed at stemming the threats to biodiversity, such as unsustainable agriculture, pollution and the growing scale of cities and transport networks.

"World leaders faced the economic crisis head on," noted Simon Stuart, head of IUCN's Species Survival Commission.

"We need that same level of investment and commitment for the environment."

Richard.Black-INTERNET@bbc.co.uk
"The only thing we did was wrong was staying in the wilderness to long...the only thing we did was right was the day we started to fight..."
-Old Spiritual
My book, The Marauders on Lulu and Amazon
User avatar
Rob del Desierto
Kulturkokopelli
 
Descriptions 128
Routes 91
Photosets 297
Triplogs 885
 
Age 32
Joined Apr 03 2006
Casa Grande, Az.
Forum Posts 2254

Re: UN Study Shows Biodiversity Loss

Postby jeffmacewen » Apr 30 2010 9:14 am

It is scary. It's also very difficult to make people understand why they should take notice. My father-in-law once asked me why I couldn't simply synthesize dopamine, etc. Rather than getting into the chemistry (Especially of the separation) with him, I tried to explain that it's much better to trick the body into making more because nature tends to do a much better job of making pure complex molecules than man does, and for far less effort. You could tell the message was lost. The loss of diversity for diversity-sake is a major issue just to begin with; but, what if some insect on a cactus near the foothills of Mt. Lemmon is wiped out by development and we never discover that this insect made an enzyme to signal mates that doubles as a potent HIV antibody in the human body by attaching itself to viral cells, etc? What are the odds that we will stumble upon that molecule ourselves by chance? (About "zero" if anyone is wondering.) This argument should appeal to every level of society, but it doesn't even register for some sad reason.
AD-AVGVSTA-PER-ANGVSTA
User avatar
jeffmacewen
Dirty "Pooch" Harry
 
Descriptions 28
Routes 20
Photosets 71
Triplogs 132
 
Age 35
Joined Jan 30 2008
Old Pueblo
Forum Posts 2584

Re: UN Study Shows Biodiversity Loss

Postby Jim_H » Apr 30 2010 4:52 pm

People don't care about biodiversity, they care about cheap meat, gays marrying, prayer in schools, evil illegal aliens, gas prices, socialized xxxxxx, taxes, which politician tapped on what bathroom stall, who is a bigot, so on and so forth.

Here's a thought. The slogan to act locally and think globally is just good sense that starts at home. Think of this, the tall grass prairies of the Midwest, including states like Iowa, had the highest biodiversity after Tropical Rain forests. Yet, today, because of agricultural practices, Iowa has some of the lowest biodiversity in the world. Corn farms are deserts of diversity. Even the starkest stretch of Great Basin has more diversity than an Iowa corn field. It doesn't stop there, longleaf, shortleaf, and slash pine forests of the south are virtually extinct as diverse functioning ecosystems with high diversity. The great species rich bottom land forest of the south are pretty much a thing of the past. Even locally, the ponderosa pine forests are greatly reduced in diversity from 150 years ago since grazing removed most of that. Really, the diversity of the country has been almost obliterated, and regardless of feelings on the tropics, we don't hear anything about out own losses here.
I think Monsoon season will begin around June 20, plus or minus 5 days, not by the calendar according to the NWS, but when dew points rise dramatically, and it begins to rain over the Sacramento Mountains. It will start about 10 days later in Arizona.
User avatar
Jim_H
Summit Kokopelli
 
Descriptions 35
Routes 7
Photosets 210
Triplogs 742
 
Age 33
Joined Sep 08 2006
Alamogordo
Forum Posts 2771

Re: UN Study Shows Biodiversity Loss

Postby big_load » Apr 30 2010 8:19 pm

jhodlof experience wrote:Think of this, the tall grass prairies of the Midwest, including states like Iowa, had the highest biodiversity after Tropical Rain forests. Yet, today, because of agricultural practices, Iowa has some of the lowest biodiversity in the world.


Great example! My folks still live in Iowa and my dad spent a great amount of time and effort cultivating a gorgeous prairie plot in a side yard bordering the railroad tracks. The highlight was a wonderful stand of Big Bluestem surrounded by Little Bluestem. It was a sad day when he had to cut it all down.
User avatar
big_load
You talkin' to me Kokopelli
 
Descriptions 0
Routes 3
Photosets 25
Triplogs 57
 
Age 53
Joined Oct 28 2003
Andover, NJ
Forum Posts 2722

Re: UN Study Shows Biodiversity Loss

Postby Jim Lyding » Apr 30 2010 9:40 pm

Read "Where the Wild Things Were" by Stolzenburg if you want to know more
"Oak-town is the city of dope...couldn't be saved by John the Pope"
Fran & Kimo please keep watching over us with your aloha spirit so that we may remain safe. A Hui Hou Kakou
User avatar
Jim Lyding
Sheakopelli
 
Descriptions 66
Routes 147
Photosets 199
Triplogs 290
 
Age 38
Joined Feb 16 2007
Walnut Creek, CA
Forum Posts 1226

Re: UN Study Shows Biodiversity Loss

Postby Jim_H » May 01 2010 8:56 am

Jim Lyding wrote:Read "Where the Wild Things Were" by Stolzenburg if you want to know more

I take it that book does not feature giant drug induced monsters?
I think Monsoon season will begin around June 20, plus or minus 5 days, not by the calendar according to the NWS, but when dew points rise dramatically, and it begins to rain over the Sacramento Mountains. It will start about 10 days later in Arizona.
User avatar
Jim_H
Summit Kokopelli
 
Descriptions 35
Routes 7
Photosets 210
Triplogs 742
 
Age 33
Joined Sep 08 2006
Alamogordo
Forum Posts 2771

Re: UN Study Shows Biodiversity Loss

Postby Jim_H » May 01 2010 8:57 am

big_load wrote:
jhodlof experience wrote:Think of this, the tall grass prairies of the Midwest, including states like Iowa, had the highest biodiversity after Tropical Rain forests. Yet, today, because of agricultural practices, Iowa has some of the lowest biodiversity in the world.


Great example! My folks still live in Iowa and my dad spent a great amount of time and effort cultivating a gorgeous prairie plot in a side yard bordering the railroad tracks. The highlight was a wonderful stand of Big Bluestem surrounded by Little Bluestem. It was a sad day when he had to cut it all down.

Devil, thy name is "Monsanto".
I think Monsoon season will begin around June 20, plus or minus 5 days, not by the calendar according to the NWS, but when dew points rise dramatically, and it begins to rain over the Sacramento Mountains. It will start about 10 days later in Arizona.
User avatar
Jim_H
Summit Kokopelli
 
Descriptions 35
Routes 7
Photosets 210
Triplogs 742
 
Age 33
Joined Sep 08 2006
Alamogordo
Forum Posts 2771

Re: UN Study Shows Biodiversity Loss

Postby Jim Lyding » May 01 2010 10:08 pm

Our planet is moving towards being populated by people & our biological accoutrements, slime, flies, jellyfish, rats, and roaches.
BTW I vote that Hodlof should change his moniker to 'Dean Wormer.' So much funnier
"Oak-town is the city of dope...couldn't be saved by John the Pope"
Fran & Kimo please keep watching over us with your aloha spirit so that we may remain safe. A Hui Hou Kakou
User avatar
Jim Lyding
Sheakopelli
 
Descriptions 66
Routes 147
Photosets 199
Triplogs 290
 
Age 38
Joined Feb 16 2007
Walnut Creek, CA
Forum Posts 1226

Re: UN Study Shows Biodiversity Loss

Postby jeffmacewen » May 03 2010 8:12 am

Dean Yeager wrote:People don't care about biodiversity, they care about cheap meat, gays marrying, prayer in schools, evil illegal aliens, gas prices, socialized xxxxxx, taxes, which politician tapped on what bathroom stall, who is a bigot, so on and so forth.

Here's a thought. The slogan to act locally and think globally is just good sense that starts at home. Think of this, the tall grass prairies of the Midwest, including states like Iowa, had the highest biodiversity after Tropical Rain forests. Yet, today, because of agricultural practices, Iowa has some of the lowest biodiversity in the world. Corn farms are deserts of diversity. Even the starkest stretch of Great Basin has more diversity than an Iowa corn field. It doesn't stop there, longleaf, shortleaf, and slash pine forests of the south are virtually extinct as diverse functioning ecosystems with high diversity. The great species rich bottom land forest of the south are pretty much a thing of the past. Even locally, the ponderosa pine forests are greatly reduced in diversity from 150 years ago since grazing removed most of that. Really, the diversity of the country has been almost obliterated, and regardless of feelings on the tropics, we don't hear anything about out own losses here.

People don't care? People don't know what biodiversity even is, let's start there!!

As to your other points, I saw a hilarious bumper sticker last night. In huge block letters it read: "I COULD BE ILLEGAL." :D
AD-AVGVSTA-PER-ANGVSTA
User avatar
jeffmacewen
Dirty "Pooch" Harry
 
Descriptions 28
Routes 20
Photosets 71
Triplogs 132
 
Age 35
Joined Jan 30 2008
Old Pueblo
Forum Posts 2584


HAZ Forum Guidelines
Support your opinion with facts.

Responding to members you disagree with is permitted if courteous.

Making first time posters or anyone feel unwelcome on site is unacceptable.

Do not post photos or a journal of a trip in the forum.
Use the Post button found in the upper left corner of every page.

Linking offsite is spam unless... [ read more ]

Return to General

Return to General

Moderator: HAZ - Moderators

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

Q: Wanna browse with less Ads?
A: Simply login

37,000 members since 1996...