89%

Moderator: HAZ - Moderators

Linked Descriptions none
Linked Areas none
Post Reply
User avatar
Jim_H
Climate Windchime
Posts: 4623
Joined: Sep 08 2006 8:14 pm
City, State: Phoenix, AZ

89%

Post by Jim_H » May 23 2018 10:03 am

That was my oxygen saturation reading on Humphrey on Saturday. I used someone else's phone which provided me with a nice wave form, and the O2 Saturation. He said his was 83%. While still hypoxic, 89% is pretty good for the altitude, even if I now feel sluggish and often not so great at elevations over 10,000', especially when compared to when I lived at up high.


If you are aware of these phone based programs that use a sensor on the phone to read your oxygen saturation, or if you have an actual portable oxygen sensor, I would be curious of people's resting oxygen saturation, and when moving, too, when they hike various higher elevation trails and summits.
Nothing more enjoyable than a good hike out of town.

User avatar
MtnBart01
Chipita Whirlybird
Posts: 478
Joined: Aug 23 2005 9:26 am
City, State: Chipita Park, Co

Re: 89%

Post by MtnBart01 » May 23 2018 12:11 pm

@Jim_H
I’ve seen different phone apps not sure how accurate. Mine was 99% at last Dr visit @ 8500’ surprisingly with a respiratory infection. The only reason I paid attention was that he mentioned He was surprised considering what I was visiting for and he said it was not uncommon for 85-93% depending on age health etc.at his office. Never really thought about it before that visit.
LET IT SNOW! Let it SNOW! Let it Snow!

no avatar
sidhayes
Speedipelli
Posts: 110
Joined: Feb 04 2002 10:17 am

Re: 89%

Post by sidhayes » May 23 2018 3:25 pm

Do you believe that these are accurate?

User avatar
azbackpackr
River Paddler
Posts: 8042
Joined: Jan 21 2006 6:46 am
City, State: Flagstaff, Arizona

Re: 89%

Post by azbackpackr » May 23 2018 3:48 pm

I wouldn't trust a cell phone to do that accurately.
There is a point of no return unremarked at the time in most lives. Graham Greene The Comedians
A clean house is a sign of a misspent life.

User avatar
amy1300
Exploring Kokopelli
Posts: 73
Joined: Jun 06 2016 7:29 pm
City, State: Phoenix. AZ

Re: 89%

Post by amy1300 » May 23 2018 4:56 pm

@Jim_H
I bet there's a confidence interval of 1-2%, so your O2 may have been as high as 91%, even if the phone is "accurate." Devices used in medical practices usually have that kind of "plus or minus" range to them.
"Sunshine on my shoulders makes me happy . . ." -- John Denver :D

User avatar
Jim_H
Climate Windchime
Posts: 4623
Joined: Sep 08 2006 8:14 pm
City, State: Phoenix, AZ

Re: 89%

Post by Jim_H » May 23 2018 8:35 pm

I do trust the device to be reasonably accurate, it was when I played with one at work a few months back and compared it to a O2 sensor used for routine vitals. 1 to 2 % margin is probably within the range, but I'm really just wondering where people fall, if they read this and have the device, and report back.

Also, I forget to ask people to report where they live, the elevation.
Nothing more enjoyable than a good hike out of town.

User avatar
KBKB
Exploring Kokopelli
Posts: 52
Joined: Apr 22 2012 4:52 pm
City, State: Fountain Hills, AZ

Re: 89%

Post by KBKB » Jun 04 2018 11:33 am

@Jim_H
I have a ~$20 Pulse Oximeter that I purchased on Amazon ZacUrate Pro Series 500DL.

After reading your post, I put it on and watched my blood oxygen saturation for a few minutes while sitting at my desk. Pulse was in the low to mid 50s and oxygen saturation varied between 91% and 96%. This pretty much matches my at-rest readings when playing with it in the past.

Elevation here is around 1500 feet.

I'll report back if / when I try it during exercise...
Last edited by joebartels on Jun 04 2018 11:44 am, edited 2 times in total.
Reason: linked with ?tag=hikearizona after the dp #, the pennies keep HAZ alive =)

User avatar
KBKB
Exploring Kokopelli
Posts: 52
Joined: Apr 22 2012 4:52 pm
City, State: Fountain Hills, AZ

Re: 89%

Post by KBKB » Jun 07 2018 5:14 pm

KBKB wrote:I have a ~$20 Pulse Oximeter that I purchased on Amazon ZacUrate Pro Series 500DL.
I tried using that ~$20 pulse oximeter last night while on a relatively flat hike.

I have doubts about its accuracy. Most of the time, it showed a pulse of around 60 with a blood oxygen saturation in the low 90s. I was occasionally able to make it show a pulse closer to 120, which was more believable. At one point along the way, it showed that my O2 saturation had dropped into the 60s and then into the 50s, which doesn't seem likely at all.

My fingertips are callused from climbing - I wonder if that's messing it up. I found that I sometimes got more believable pulse readings when I turned it around so that the sensor was on the fingernail side. I'm pretty sure that's not how it's supposed to be used though.

User avatar
Jim_H
Climate Windchime
Posts: 4623
Joined: Sep 08 2006 8:14 pm
City, State: Phoenix, AZ

Re: 89%

Post by Jim_H » Jun 08 2018 3:44 pm

The equipment is probably fine. If the wave form is not good, then it isn't able to get a good read. Even hospital equipment struggles if people move around. Just stop for a few seconds, remain still and most likely you will get an accurate read.
Nothing more enjoyable than a good hike out of town.

User avatar
KBKB
Exploring Kokopelli
Posts: 52
Joined: Apr 22 2012 4:52 pm
City, State: Fountain Hills, AZ

Re: 89%

Post by KBKB » Jun 10 2018 12:20 pm

I bought another pulse oximeter. The new one is a "Santamedical Generation 2 OLED Fingertip Pulse Oximeter".

When I compare them side by side while sitting at my desk, the Santamedical device shows O2 saturation readings that are two to four points higher than the ZacUrate Pro 500DL. E.g. there are times when the ZacUrate shows an O2 sat of 92%, but the Santamedical devices shows an O2 sat of 96%.

I had my wife try them out. For her, the two devices produced almost identical readings.

no avatar
sidhayes
Speedipelli
Posts: 110
Joined: Feb 04 2002 10:17 am

Re: 89%

Post by sidhayes » Jun 10 2018 4:58 pm

@KBKB
The higher readings are more likely correct.

User avatar
Jim_H
Climate Windchime
Posts: 4623
Joined: Sep 08 2006 8:14 pm
City, State: Phoenix, AZ

Re: 89%

Post by Jim_H » Jun 10 2018 6:27 pm

@KBKB
Try them on a mountain, Mmmm, say one over 10,000', and then report back!
Nothing more enjoyable than a good hike out of town.

Post Reply

Return to “Fitness & Health”


cron