@Hippy
Colter was a fraud. The evidence is mind-numbing. I've been guiding at Grand Canyon since 2013 and all anyone ever talked about was what a badazz Colter was. I hated her stories. They seemed so fake and too good to be true. I only spoke of her if someone asked.
I'm a firm supporter of Shaw's book.
Find his page on Facebook (False Architect) send him a message tell him Haley sent you, request a free copy of his book and he'll send you one. FREE no charge.
He isn't in this to make money, he's in this to make people aware of the truth.
Anyway, he has like 60 pages of sources and we can view them all ourselves and what I've seen is pretty hard evidence to deny. Unfortunately the National Park Service has invested a lot of money in supporting "strong female characters"....that's all Colter was, a character. She was a real person who stole other people's work and became a character in a story. It will take a long long time for the NPS to get it's act together regarding Colter. Maybe I'll work on that while I'm wearing my flat hat ;)
Yo Hippy,
Thanks for posting regarding Colter. Looked to me like the topic ledged out with no response from anyone to my posting of May 29.
I’ll be glad to engage on the issue provided you give a response to the points I made. I’d like to see that you read my ideas—for example, I’ve already read the full book (I mentioned I was half-way through) so there is no need for me to connect with Mr. Shaw to seek out a free copy. I would not expect an author to provide me with a free copy—he deserves to be paid for his efforts.
In your first paragraph, you express your anger/hostility/jealousy toward Colter. I don’t consider your emotional response toward her as evidence that would convince me that she was a fraud. It is only evidence that you get angry at someone dead since 1958.
You mention that the evidence that is “mind-numbing.” To mount a convincing argument, first un-numb your mind. Then provide what you think is evidence that makes the case. Simply stating that you are a firm supporter of Shaw convinces me that you are a firm supporter of Shaw but doesn’t move the needle on whether or not you’ll convert me.
If Mr. Shaw is not interested in making money, he would post his e-book on Amazon for a lot less than the $12.95 cost. (I know because I price out my own works at the minimum cost and currently have several titles on Amazon at the bare minimum to cover hard-copy publication. I have e-books about the Canyon and a novel for ‘Free to Read with Amazon Prime’)
You mention 60 pages of references. For those to have any standing, we’d need to read the original sources and vet how those references are being used to support the Fraud allegation. Simply having a long list of references is not enough. There are ‘scientists’ who refute climate change—their papers have a long list of references. For many years, the tobacco industry issued ‘scientific’ studies showing no ill effects or positive benefits from smoking with a long list of studies/references to support the claim. Ditto with the sugar industry who touted the benefits of eating a high-sugar diet. We need to evaluate the references and how they were used. No points for simply having a long list of references and it will not necessarily qualify as ‘hard evidence.’
(1) That is one reason why I stated that I didn’t hear any shots fired from the grassy knoll. Colter provided a two-page summary/resume of her career (see the link I provided May 29). In that resume she states that she worked as an interior designer for the El Tovar—she did not take credit as the architect. Yet that is one of Mr. Shaw’s first assertions of fraud that she did.
(2) What evidence can you provide that the other architects attached to the Canyon’s structures had the artistic insight for Native Cultures and storytelling that Colter had even early on in life? I did a web search to find the type of structures others designed before coming to work under Colter/Fred Harvey and they were standard issue designs—nothing unique beyond the current design motif.
If you don’t have a response for (1) and (2)—we have ledged out. You’ll just have to continue to be angry/hostile/jealous toward Colter on your own (excuse me, with backpacker, maybe those who have 'liked' your post). But I will not jump off trying to land in the river. I took the time to provide my thinking, your turn to rebut.
I contacted a friend who worked at the Canyon as a Historian and asked him to join the discussion. He spent his whole career working for Fred Harvey and then Xanterra. (Yep, Fred Harvey hired their own Interpretive Historians to guide guests). So far, he has not joined the list so I’ll not reveal his name. He did design the Bright Angel History room and is responsible for many of the Harvey Girl and Fred Harvey items gathered in the display cases. He is interested in reading the Shaw book—he wants to get his hands on the reference list. (I’ll try again to get him to join.)
Why not invited Shaw to this forum? We can start a separate thread if anyone is interested. I’m busy with plenty of projects of my own but will always find time for a good ‘ole fashion squabble over which end of the egg to crack.
Of course, Colter was a character. I’m sure there have been plenty of embellishment around her. There are plenty of larger-than-life characters attached to the Canyon. It is a big hole with plenty of room to hold plenty of tall tales.