posting photos old vs. new
Posted: Jul 09 2007 7:33 am
I am new to the site and am totally head over heels in love with the whole concept. Can't believe I didn't know about this site until recently. I am posting a question about how irritating is it to others if I go back and trip-log my AZ life since 2003? I had my own log system for hikes/trips, but it pales in comparison to this website.
I can hide the trips so they don't pop up on the "new" list. But I like putting the photos out there and am fascinated by the ranking/viewing process. I've been torturing family and friends with these photos (who really don't care) for years, and it's nice to get feedback from others with similar interests.
Is it irritating to people for old photos to flash up on the "new" list when they're really not new? What about triplogs that are old - is it worth hiding them all to prevent flooding of the new list with all my old hikes?
I can hide the trips so they don't pop up on the "new" list. But I like putting the photos out there and am fascinated by the ranking/viewing process. I've been torturing family and friends with these photos (who really don't care) for years, and it's nice to get feedback from others with similar interests.
Is it irritating to people for old photos to flash up on the "new" list when they're really not new? What about triplogs that are old - is it worth hiding them all to prevent flooding of the new list with all my old hikes?