Why I like White Mtns. hiking better than Flagstaff area
Posted: Dec 02 2011 8:42 am
I recently returned to Eagar for a few days, and hiked South Fork. I have to say, I still like the White Mountains better, just in general, for hiking and mountain biking, than I do the Flagstaff/Sedona area. It's true they are not super steep or spectacular, but they are far wilder. Here is a list of my reasons:
1. Surface water. The White Mountains, especially the Springerville and Alpine Districts of the forest, have a lot more surface water, year-round creeks, and lakes. There are marshes, three small rivers and their forks, (Black, Blue, Little Colorado) beaver dams, water birds, etc.
2. Crowds: There generally aren't any, except on Mt. Baldy. Even Baldy isn't all that crowded if you go up the East trail. On most other trails you can often be the only one hiking on any particular day. Escudilla used to get crowded, too, before it burned to a crisp. Now it's closed for awhile.
3. Views: The views from the tops of mountains do not include ostentatious McMansions (such as Sedona views would have) or cities or large towns. Mostly the views are wild--mountain range upon mountain range for as far as you can see.
4. Off-trail hiking: It's easy to hike off-trail in the White Mountains, and with a set of good maps you could probably backpack all the way to the Gila Wilderness without seeing a soul, and have plenty of water sources along the way.
5. Wildlife: It kind of goes without saying. In the White Mountains it is commonplace to see large herds of elk, small herds of deer or pronghorn, bald eagles, osprey, beavers, muskrats, etc. Less common but frequently seen are bears, mountain lions, bobcats, foxes, raccoons. I have lived and hiked in Flag for a year and have seen no pronghorn, and only a few elk and deer, and no bears or other animals.
6. Permits: What's a permit?
7. Highway driving: Not much traffic.
8. Dirt road driving: Not much traffic.
1. Surface water. The White Mountains, especially the Springerville and Alpine Districts of the forest, have a lot more surface water, year-round creeks, and lakes. There are marshes, three small rivers and their forks, (Black, Blue, Little Colorado) beaver dams, water birds, etc.
2. Crowds: There generally aren't any, except on Mt. Baldy. Even Baldy isn't all that crowded if you go up the East trail. On most other trails you can often be the only one hiking on any particular day. Escudilla used to get crowded, too, before it burned to a crisp. Now it's closed for awhile.
3. Views: The views from the tops of mountains do not include ostentatious McMansions (such as Sedona views would have) or cities or large towns. Mostly the views are wild--mountain range upon mountain range for as far as you can see.
4. Off-trail hiking: It's easy to hike off-trail in the White Mountains, and with a set of good maps you could probably backpack all the way to the Gila Wilderness without seeing a soul, and have plenty of water sources along the way.
5. Wildlife: It kind of goes without saying. In the White Mountains it is commonplace to see large herds of elk, small herds of deer or pronghorn, bald eagles, osprey, beavers, muskrats, etc. Less common but frequently seen are bears, mountain lions, bobcats, foxes, raccoons. I have lived and hiked in Flag for a year and have seen no pronghorn, and only a few elk and deer, and no bears or other animals.
6. Permits: What's a permit?
7. Highway driving: Not much traffic.
8. Dirt road driving: Not much traffic.