An interesting topic came up last night while I was talking to a friend. Which city do you think is a better place for a hiking-minded person to live- Phoenix, or Tucson? Why?
I'll post my own answer, but I'm curious to see what others have to say first.
Lizard
Tucson vs. Phoenix
Moderator: HAZ - Moderators
Linked Guides none
Linked Area, etc none
-
LizardGuides: 15 | Official Routes: 0Triplogs Last: 5,271 d | RS: 0Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: never
- Joined: Feb 05 2002 6:40 pm
- City, State: Phoenix, AZ
Tucson vs. Phoenix
"Of course we weren't lost. We were merely where we shouldn't have been, without knowing exactly where that was."
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
JimGuides: 73 | Official Routes: 36Triplogs Last: 6 d | RS: 67Water Reports 1Y: 10 | Last: 142 d
- Joined: Sep 08 2006 8:14 pm
Re: Tucson vs. Phoenix
I think the debate got settled 9 years ago, but since HAZ wanted me to join in again by virtue of this popping up on the home screen, it seems to me that this debate or poll was really just a way of seeing who lived where when they voted, if they lived in either location. HAZ had and probably has still, more phoenix members than Tucson ones.
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes

