Outdoor Ethics
Moderator: HAZ - Moderators
Linked Guides none
Linked Area, etc none
-
outdoor_loverGuides: 7 | Official Routes: 5Triplogs Last: 96 d | RS: 2Water Reports 1Y: 18 | Last: 95 d
- Joined: Aug 19 2011 7:49 pm
- City, State: Scottsdale, AZ
Outdoor Ethics
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty & well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, totally worn out & proclaiming, "Wow What a Ride!"
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
RowdyandMeGuides: 7 | Official Routes: 0Triplogs Last: none | RS: 620Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: 740 d
- Joined: Jul 16 2012 5:48 am
- City, State: Green Valley,Az
Re: Outdoor Ethics
So when does Snowbird bow season open and what is the limit?
Rowdy and Widowmaker
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
big_loadGuides: 0 | Official Routes: 1Triplogs Last: 595 d | RS: 3Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: 2,483 d
- Joined: Oct 28 2003 11:20 am
- City, State: Andover, NJ
Re: Outdoor Ethics
The magic number in a designated wilderness is 15.sam_hikes wrote:Is 30 hikers some magic number as somehow NPS also decided they would allow up to a maximum of 30 rim-rim GC dayhikers under the special SUP permit.
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
chumleyGuides: 94 | Official Routes: 241Triplogs Last: 6 d | RS: 65Water Reports 1Y: 78 | Last: 7 d
- Joined: Sep 18 2002 8:59 am
- City, State: Tempe, AZ
Re: Outdoor Ethics
@big_load
That's not even magic. It's not specified in the law, and different agencies establish different rules. In fact the same agencies enact different rules. Fifteen is the most common number that I've seen for Forest Service managed wildernesses. In Aravaipa, BLM has a 10 person limit. Coconino has no posted group limits on the Red Rock District, though Kachina Peaks has an oft-ignored 15 person limit posted at the trailhead for Humphreys.
That's not even magic. It's not specified in the law, and different agencies establish different rules. In fact the same agencies enact different rules. Fifteen is the most common number that I've seen for Forest Service managed wildernesses. In Aravaipa, BLM has a 10 person limit. Coconino has no posted group limits on the Red Rock District, though Kachina Peaks has an oft-ignored 15 person limit posted at the trailhead for Humphreys.
I'm not sure what my spirit animal is, but I'm confident it has rabies.
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
wildwesthikesGuides: 0 | Official Routes: 0Triplogs Last: 1,853 d | RS: 0Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: 1,709 d
- Joined: Nov 23 2010 9:41 am
Re: Outdoor Ethics
@friendofThundergod
I admit I find myself ranting about this more than is healthy. I often find myself reflecting on this - especially when out hiking with a buddy. In the end I always come to the conclusion: at least they are getting outdoors even if it's ruining the experience for myself and others a bit!
I admit I find myself ranting about this more than is healthy. I often find myself reflecting on this - especially when out hiking with a buddy. In the end I always come to the conclusion: at least they are getting outdoors even if it's ruining the experience for myself and others a bit!
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
big_loadGuides: 0 | Official Routes: 1Triplogs Last: 595 d | RS: 3Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: 2,483 d
- Joined: Oct 28 2003 11:20 am
- City, State: Andover, NJ
Re: Outdoor Ethics
@chumley
True, but I'm not aware of any wilderness where the limit is larger than 15.
I've seen groups as large as 60 (in matching t-shirts) on the Black Mesa Loop, but I try not to think about it if possible.
True, but I'm not aware of any wilderness where the limit is larger than 15.
I've seen groups as large as 60 (in matching t-shirts) on the Black Mesa Loop, but I try not to think about it if possible.
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
chumleyGuides: 94 | Official Routes: 241Triplogs Last: 6 d | RS: 65Water Reports 1Y: 78 | Last: 7 d
- Joined: Sep 18 2002 8:59 am
- City, State: Tempe, AZ
Re: Outdoor Ethics
@big_load
I believe I've seen 20 and 30 as limits before. And some specify "beating hearts" in their limit, which means the total number includes people, pets, and stock. And none of it matters because except for where permits are issued there is nobody enforcing the rules anyway.
I believe I've seen 20 and 30 as limits before. And some specify "beating hearts" in their limit, which means the total number includes people, pets, and stock. And none of it matters because except for where permits are issued there is nobody enforcing the rules anyway.
I'm not sure what my spirit animal is, but I'm confident it has rabies.
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
The_DudeGuides: 1 | Official Routes: 10Triplogs Last: 561 d | RS: 22Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: 1,693 d
- Joined: Jun 10 2011 11:19 am
- City, State: Phoenix, AZ
Re: Outdoor Ethics
When I did Battleship in the Supes earlier this month, there was a group of 30+ seniors just getting off on a group hike. There was a ranger at the TH and he said nothing regarding the group size. I did not figure it a big concern since they were doing a short hike, and did not seem to have an air of belligerence about them...all were appropriately geared up for hiking and no pets.
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
wildwesthikesGuides: 0 | Official Routes: 0Triplogs Last: 1,853 d | RS: 0Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: 1,709 d
- Joined: Nov 23 2010 9:41 am
Re: Outdoor Ethics
That is just impressive from an organizational standpoint.big_load wrote:I've seen groups as large as 60 (in matching t-shirts)
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
big_loadGuides: 0 | Official Routes: 1Triplogs Last: 595 d | RS: 3Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: 2,483 d
- Joined: Oct 28 2003 11:20 am
- City, State: Andover, NJ
Re: Outdoor Ethics
True, but it really sucks when you're going the opposite direction from them.wildwesthikes wrote: ↑Jan 22 2020 11:49 amThat is just impressive from an organizational standpoint.big_load wrote:I've seen groups as large as 60 (in matching t-shirts)
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
gummoGuides: 13 | Official Routes: 0Triplogs Last: 103 d | RS: 0Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: never
- Joined: Oct 23 2010 10:07 am
- City, State: mesa
Re: Outdoor Ethics
Outdoor ethics tip:
If you are in a group that is stranded in the wilderness with no food, it's okay to turn to cannibalism to survive, but you must wait for the others to die before eating them.
If you are in a group that is stranded in the wilderness with no food, it's okay to turn to cannibalism to survive, but you must wait for the others to die before eating them.
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
PivoGuides: 2 | Official Routes: 22Triplogs Last: 4 d | RS: 0Water Reports 1Y: 2 | Last: 248 d
- Joined: Mar 01 2009 8:18 pm
- City, State: Aztec, NM
Re: Outdoor Ethics
@gummo
If you're in a very large group, please feel free to start immediately.gummo wrote:If you are in a group that is stranded in the wilderness with no food, it's okay to turn to cannibalism to survive, but you must wait for the others to die before eating them.
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
Mountain_RatGuides: 11 | Official Routes: 20Triplogs Last: 126 d | RS: 1Water Reports 1Y: 3 | Last: 124 d
- Joined: Jul 14 2011 11:15 am
- City, State: Tucson, AZ
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
LosDosSloFolksGuides: 0 | Official Routes: 0Triplogs Last: 98 d | RS: 70Water Reports 1Y: 8 | Last: 149 d
- Joined: Feb 10 2019 3:42 pm
- City, State: Cave Creek, AZ
Re: Outdoor Ethics
@Mountain_Rat
Don't forget the fava beans and a nice Chianti.
Don't forget the fava beans and a nice Chianti.
"If you wait, all that happens is you get older"
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
Mountain_RatGuides: 11 | Official Routes: 20Triplogs Last: 126 d | RS: 1Water Reports 1Y: 3 | Last: 124 d
- Joined: Jul 14 2011 11:15 am
- City, State: Tucson, AZ
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
LosDosSloFolksGuides: 0 | Official Routes: 0Triplogs Last: 98 d | RS: 70Water Reports 1Y: 8 | Last: 149 d
- Joined: Feb 10 2019 3:42 pm
- City, State: Cave Creek, AZ
Re: Outdoor Ethics
@Mountain_Rat
Tell it to Hannibal.
Tell it to Hannibal.
"If you wait, all that happens is you get older"
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
Mountain_RatGuides: 11 | Official Routes: 20Triplogs Last: 126 d | RS: 1Water Reports 1Y: 3 | Last: 124 d
- Joined: Jul 14 2011 11:15 am
- City, State: Tucson, AZ
Re: Outdoor Ethics
@LosDosSloFolks
It would seem that he has no culinary sense about him. Human is best served with with greens and a light starch such as herbed rice.
It would seem that he has no culinary sense about him. Human is best served with with greens and a light starch such as herbed rice.
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
LosDosSloFolksGuides: 0 | Official Routes: 0Triplogs Last: 98 d | RS: 70Water Reports 1Y: 8 | Last: 149 d
- Joined: Feb 10 2019 3:42 pm
- City, State: Cave Creek, AZ
Re: Outdoor Ethics
@Mountain_Rat
No further debate from me. The Mountain Rat has taken this thread to a very disturbing place.
No further debate from me. The Mountain Rat has taken this thread to a very disturbing place.

"If you wait, all that happens is you get older"
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
Mountain_RatGuides: 11 | Official Routes: 20Triplogs Last: 126 d | RS: 1Water Reports 1Y: 3 | Last: 124 d
- Joined: Jul 14 2011 11:15 am
- City, State: Tucson, AZ
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
JimGuides: 73 | Official Routes: 36Triplogs Last: 7 d | RS: 67Water Reports 1Y: 10 | Last: 142 d
- Joined: Sep 08 2006 8:14 pm
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
Mountain_RatGuides: 11 | Official Routes: 20Triplogs Last: 126 d | RS: 1Water Reports 1Y: 3 | Last: 124 d
- Joined: Jul 14 2011 11:15 am
- City, State: Tucson, AZ
Re: Outdoor Ethics
@Jim_H
Yes! Thanks for asking. While the Chianti would be perfectly fine in this case, I would personally go with a nice Merlot.
Yes! Thanks for asking. While the Chianti would be perfectly fine in this case, I would personally go with a nice Merlot.
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes

