http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/v ... c=eoa-iotd
I know potash is cool and all that, but just imagine the ramifications if this thing spilled into the Colorado River. Perhaps potash isn't that dangerous.
I don't think this is a good thing
Moderator: HAZ - Moderators
Linked Guides none
Linked Area, etc none
-
JimmyLydingGuides: 111 | Official Routes: 94Triplogs Last: 539 d | RS: 0Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: 2,111 d
- Joined: Feb 16 2007 3:17 pm
- City, State: Walnut Creek, CA
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
JimGuides: 73 | Official Routes: 36Triplogs Last: 6 d | RS: 67Water Reports 1Y: 10 | Last: 142 d
- Joined: Sep 08 2006 8:14 pm
Re: I don't think this is a good thing
I am more concerned about the Hanford site in the NW, than what is basically a salt mine. The mineral is probably nothing like phosphorus or Nitrogen, in terms of altering water fertility if it got into the river in any large quantity, but the salt part concerns me. However, I have no knowledge if that would be an issue the way sodium salts are, in the water.
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
toddakGuides: 13 | Official Routes: 6Triplogs Last: 15 d | RS: 0Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: 1,491 d
- Joined: Nov 15 2005 8:46 pm
- City, State: Jackson, CA
Re: I don't think this is a good thing
Every time you get into your car, do you "imagine the ramifications if this thing hits a brick wall going 75mph"? Just sayin, life is always a trade-off of risks and rewards, and it seems too short to spend lots of time worrying about all the "what ifs".Jim Lyding wrote:imagine the ramifications if this thing spilled into the Colorado River
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes

