
@rvcarter recently posted a great new hike description where the first line states
Reaching the Superstition Mountains highest point...
referring to the peak often referred to on HAZ as 5057.
How is that the highest point in the Superstition Mountains I wondered? At more than 1200 feet higher, I would think that 6,266 foot Mound Mountain is the highest point. The hike description written by GPSJoe even says as much:
So what gives? Clearly Mound Mountain is higher. But is it in the Superstition Mountains?Did you ever want to go to the highest point in the Superstition Mountains?

So I did some preliminary research.
Older maps place the name "Superstition Mountains" only on the prominent western range that runs about 7 miles from current-day LDSP to the Peralta trailhead. In fact, even current maps label only this as the Superstition Mountains -- with the exception of a secondary identification between Weavers and Miners Needles. That's it. No USGS map anywhere indicates that anything east of there is the Superstition Mountains.
What is clearly marked is the Superstition Wilderness. But that is a political boundary, not a natural one.
Wiki is all over the place with contradictory information, as are the various sites dedicated to hiking or climbing peaks.
The USGS Geographic Names Information System (GNIS) lists "Superstition Mountain" as "The highest peak in the Superstition Mountains" This is as official as it gets. (Referring to peak 5057).
There is a USGS Benchmark on peak 5057 originally monumented in 1899 and described then as "LOCATED ON EASTERN END OF SUPERSTITION MTN.,...PROBABLY HIGHEST POINT ON MTN"
The 1910 and 1936 recoveries of the disc reported "IT IS ON HIGHEST PEAK OF SUPERSTITION MTS."
In 1938, it was reported as "ON SOUTHEASTERNMOST ONE OF TWO HIGHEST PEAKS OF SUPERSTITION MTS."
In 1946, "ON THE MOST SOUTHEASTERLY OF THE TWO HIGHEST PEAKS OF SUPERSTITION MOUNTAIN."
Apparently the current disc was reset in 1965 without being documented with the USGS. Full USGS Datasheet.
Mound Mountain also has a USGS disc, but the datasheet for that disc has no indication of it being the highest point, or even part of the Superstition Mountains. It only indicates it's location with regards to local features: "LOCATED ABOUT 1 MI SE. OF REEVIS RANCH. ON ROUND, PINE-COVERED HILL ON DIVIDE BETWEEN CAMPAIGN CREEK TO E., REEVIS CREEK TO W. AND PINE CREEK TO N., ON EAST EDGE OF HIGHEST POINT OF MOUND-SHAPED MOUNTAIN."
The USGS GNIS report for Mound Mountain does not indicate it as being within the Superstition Mountains or not.
So while Mound Mountain is clearly higher than 5057 ... and the highest point in the Superstition Wilderness, I think it is certainly up for debate as to whether or not it is in the Superstition Mountains. I'd be happy if the Supes experts here chimed in (@friendofthundergod @wallyfrack etc.). Anybody have defined boundaries for the mountain range? Maps show all kinds of other named ranges inside what many consider to be the Superstition Mountains: Fish Creek Mountains, Salt River Mountains, Webster Mountain, Coffee Flat Mountain, Iron Mountain, Hackberry Butte, etc. It's not uncommon to have named features within a larger range, but that doesn't appear to be the case here. At least not according to how maps were drawn.
So seriously ... where are the Superstition Mountains?