Atkins wrote:The main news is that the "top of the line" Powershot G11 has a new "high sensitivity" 10MP sensor. This is a fairly bold step by Canon, dropping resolution from 15MP in the G10 to "only" 10MP in the G11. Of course this is something that advanced photographers have been requesting for a while in the hope that dropping the pixel count will improve the image quality at high ISO settings. According to Canon sources, the noise performance of the G11 should be up to two stops better than that of the G10. That means that image quality at ISO 3200 on the G11 should be similar to that at ISO 800 on the G10.
Canon wrote:The PowerShot G-series has long been the flagship of the PowerShot line. The new Canon PowerShot G11 Digital Camera further adds to the legacy of this award-winning series with its advanced features, variety of shooting modes and compatible EOS accessories which help to enhance one's photographic creativity. Designed for those looking for a pocket-sized camera with SLR functionality, this new powerful camera is ideal for the consumer who is looking to capture beautiful landscapes and professional portraits by offering:
# A 10.0-Megapixel High Sensitivity System to capture images with a powerful 5x Optical Zoom lens with Optical Image Stabilization. Additionally, a 28mm (equivalent to 28-140 mm) wide-angle lens helps to get large groups into one shot at events such as a family reunion.
# A 2.8-inch vari-angle PureColor System LCD, new to the G-series, allowing for easier on-camera previewing and reviewing of images from nearly every angle, while still incorporating the optical viewfinder found on previous models.
# Easy access to heavily used functions with two mode dials for adjusting ISO and exposure compensation, and a full range of shooting and recording modes, including RAW + JPEG for ultimate creative control when editing images.
# A host of optional accessories, including Speedlite flashes, an underwater housing and a tele-converter lens to provide further photographic flexibility.
Scheduled to be available in October, the PowerShot G11 Digital Camera retails for an estimated price of $499.99.
I want one. Actually, I'd probably stick with the g10. I can't think of a time I'd be using iso3200... Plus, would the g10 probably drop in price with the g11 coming out?
"Arizona is the land of contrast... You can go from Minnesota to California in a matter of minutes, then have Mexican food that night." -Jack Dykinga
I love my G10. It will take a lot of improvements in the series to make me jump ship. Additionally, the G11 has a slightly larger frame a partial plastic body. Just my observations...
Actually a little more, at the bottom of the second quote.
The 3200 ISO is just an example, every photo will technically be about 2 full stops sharper in detail. It will be interesting see side by side examples. Most likely you'll be able to crop and maintain more clarity. So in essence your zoom factor has increased similar to IS.
I'm not sure but it would seem for the sensor to get any bigger they're breaking the laws of physics to keep the camera so tiny too. However it's probably the same size here just more sensitive.
It seems like a good move. It may take another version or two for them to perfect it. The side by side examples will tell all when the come out. If it was an extreme difference you'd think they'd provide some marketing examples...
Yesterday Canon announced the EOS 7D. It's a crop but not to replace the 50D. More of a new category for Canon as their high end crop line.
A couple lenses too, most notably
The new EF 100/2.8L IS USM has Canon's new hybrid IS system which compensates for both angular movement of the lens (as does the original IS) and also vertical and horizontal translation, which becomes important for macro work. It's also now an "L" lens, so it gets a red stripe!
I think one L series prime would serve you better than a 7D. Then again you're proof there's no hurry to upgrade. Heck I was happy with my 20D for a good year!
Yeah, an L series prime would be quite sweet... Plus if I dumped that much money into one focal length it would force me to shoot something other than super-wide views.
Did you upgrade to 5D after the 20D?
"Arizona is the land of contrast... You can go from Minnesota to California in a matter of minutes, then have Mexican food that night." -Jack Dykinga
Yeah the old 5D. I was somewhat disappointed. That expensive 16-35mm had slight vignetting. It had a slight warped fish-eye (cool on some shots, irritating on others). Then you really couldn't take a photo of a flat blue sky or it would have slight ripple bands. Not that I'm into including a lot of sky without clouds but it was irritating. The 16-35mm II was a tad better. Both were more stunning on the 20D. Even though it cropped using only the best of the lens they were truly flawless. Then the 180mm on a crop with an extending tube turned it into a telescope