Natural Arches and Bridges labels
Moderator: HAZ - Moderators
Linked Guides none
Linked Area, etc none
-
hippiepunkpirateGuides: 25 | Official Routes: 23Triplogs Last: 272 d | RS: 0Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: 3,645 d
- Joined: May 30 2008 7:43 am
- City, State: Peoria, AZ
- Contact:
Natural Arches and Bridges labels
Today I created the geology labels "natural arch" and "natural bridge". Being that these features are often popular hiking destinations, I expect they may get a fair amount of use. I've laid out the differences between a natural arch and natural bridge in the label descriptions (based on the Natural Arches and Bridges Society). Hope everyone will check out the labels and start applying them. I will start going through some old hike photos and try to label some.
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
NighthikerGuides: 0 | Official Routes: 0Triplogs Last: 1,415 d | RS: 0Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: never
- Joined: Feb 03 2002 6:59 am
- City, State: Payson
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
PaleoRobGuides: 171 | Official Routes: 78Triplogs Last: 443 d | RS: 24Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: 831 d
- Joined: Apr 03 2006 12:21 pm
- City, State: Pocatello, ID
- Contact:
Re: Natural Arches and Bridges labels
Sweet! I was thinking of doing something similar but you beat me to it! I will definitely be using them.
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
hippiepunkpirateGuides: 25 | Official Routes: 23Triplogs Last: 272 d | RS: 0Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: 3,645 d
- Joined: May 30 2008 7:43 am
- City, State: Peoria, AZ
- Contact:
Re: Natural Arches and Bridges labels
I also added bigger features like: monocline, syncline, anticline and laccolith. All very Colorado Plateauish stuff that's right up your alley. I bet we could think of a few others...PageRob wrote:Sweet! I was thinking of doing something similar but you beat me to it! I will definitely be using them.
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
Sun_RayGuides: 0 | Official Routes: 0Triplogs Last: 125 d | RS: 137Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: 877 d
- Joined: Sep 09 2004 11:53 am
- City, State: Scottsdale, AZ
- Contact:
Re: Natural Arches and Bridges labels
Great.... thinks for your efforts!
Brian
Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday......there is no SOMEDAY!
Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday......there is no SOMEDAY!
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
JoelHazeltonGuides: 16 | Official Routes: 1Triplogs Last: 15 d | RS: 1Water Reports 1Y: 2 | Last: 76 d
- Joined: Mar 22 2006 7:45 am
- City, State: Phoenix, AZ
- Contact:
Re: Natural Arches and Bridges labels
Jake, I noticed that you labeled Royal Arch with "natural arch". Based on the descriptions you included (i.e. current or stream runs through the opening), wouldn't that classfiy as a natural bridge?
Cool feature! I will certainly be using it to find hikes now.
Cool feature! I will certainly be using it to find hikes now.
"Arizona is the land of contrast... You can go from Minnesota to California in a matter of minutes, then have Mexican food that night." -Jack Dykinga
http://www.joelhazelton.com
http://www.joelhazelton.com
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
hippiepunkpirateGuides: 25 | Official Routes: 23Triplogs Last: 272 d | RS: 0Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: 3,645 d
- Joined: May 30 2008 7:43 am
- City, State: Peoria, AZ
- Contact:
Re: Natural Arches and Bridges labels
Yes, good call. I was kinda rushing through labeling stuff and not paying close enough attention.azpride wrote:Jake, I noticed that you labeled Royal Arch with "natural arch". Based on the descriptions you included (i.e. current or stream runs through the opening), wouldn't that classfiy as a natural bridge?
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
NighthikerGuides: 0 | Official Routes: 0Triplogs Last: 1,415 d | RS: 0Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: never
- Joined: Feb 03 2002 6:59 am
- City, State: Payson
Re: Natural Arches and Bridges labels
I have a copy of Amateur Geology by Cvancara and also been trying to read geologic maps. Little trouble withstrikes and dips. Is this something you may be including ?
jk
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
hippiepunkpirateGuides: 25 | Official Routes: 23Triplogs Last: 272 d | RS: 0Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: 3,645 d
- Joined: May 30 2008 7:43 am
- City, State: Peoria, AZ
- Contact:
Re: Natural Arches and Bridges labels
Hmmm...I'm not entirely sure how to incorporate strikes and dips into any of the geology labels, although they are essential in proving the existence of monoclines and such. I can attempt to help your understanding of strikes and dips here. The main thing to worry about on the the little symbol (which slightly resembles a T), is that the shorter line of the symbol indicates the direction of the dip in rock. Dip refers to the downward tilt. The strike is indicated by the longer line of the symbol, and is there really just to give reference to the direction of the dip. This only really applies to sedimentary rocks, which are always deposited horizontally, so a dip can indicate a tectonic force has been exerted on the rock. Hope that helps. Perhaps Rob could explain it better than I can, I'm sure his schooling was more extensive than mine was. To be honest, it is hard to grasp the concept fully until to actually go out into the field with a Brunton compass and measure strikes and dips first hand (over and over).Nighthiker wrote:I have a copy of Amateur Geology by Cvancara and also been trying to read geologic maps. Little trouble withstrikes and dips. Is this something you may be including ?
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes

