Thank you, everyone, for all the feedback under the topic "Is bad accuracy of tracks normal?"
I've adjusted my expectations.
And, with an inordinate amount of click-drag-drop action, I've also adjusted a version of the Camelback Walk route I saved down from my unit earlier today and posted for review at http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?hl=en&gl ... 73f950ec80.
The edited track is: http://hikearizona.com/location_g.php?DR=&G=9109.
Given the amount of craftsmanship needed, I won't be doing the "hand editing" thing that often, but will from time to time.
I did the editing via an online track editing utility I found at http://wtracks.free.fr/. This utility not only allows you to move dots, it also lets you add dots to the end.
Does anyone know of a "better" track editing utility (maybe one that allows you add dots between dots or to draw a track just by clicking and dragging out a path)?
There is a downloadable program at http://www.knackes.com/blog/index.php?p ... ditor-1070, but that doesn't seem to work for me. There may be more items at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Main_Page.
Improving the visual accuracy of tracks via editing ...
Moderators: HAZ - Moderators, GPS - Admin
Linked Guides none
Linked Area, etc none
-
paulshikleejrGuides: 20 | Official Routes: 41Triplogs Last: 819 d | RS: 4Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: 3,716 d
- Joined: Feb 02 2010 4:37 pm
- City, State: Scottsdale, AZ
- Contact:
Improving the visual accuracy of tracks via editing ...
Decisionmaking and action should only be informed by, not subject to, healthy, reasonable concern.
That being said, anything worth doing is worth doing to excess.
That being said, anything worth doing is worth doing to excess.
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
paulshikleejrGuides: 20 | Official Routes: 41Triplogs Last: 819 d | RS: 4Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: 3,716 d
- Joined: Feb 02 2010 4:37 pm
- City, State: Scottsdale, AZ
- Contact:
Re: Improving the visual accuracy of tracks via editing ...
Another edited track for comparison: http://hikearizona.com/location_g.php?GPS=9110 versus http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?hl=en&gl ... 1e8e34257d ...
big_load, how did you hand edit your tracks?
big_load, how did you hand edit your tracks?
Decisionmaking and action should only be informed by, not subject to, healthy, reasonable concern.
That being said, anything worth doing is worth doing to excess.
That being said, anything worth doing is worth doing to excess.
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
big_loadGuides: 0 | Official Routes: 1Triplogs Last: 594 d | RS: 3Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: 2,483 d
- Joined: Oct 28 2003 11:20 am
- City, State: Andover, NJ
Re: Improving the visual accuracy of tracks via editing ...
I mostly used the track editing tools under the "tools" heading in MapSource. They're not all that great; but creating a whole, new clean track that way isn't especially hard.paulshikleejr wrote:big_load, how did you hand edit your tracks?
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
PLC92084Guides: 2 | Official Routes: 3Triplogs Last: 4,132 d | RS: 0Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: 5,277 d
- Joined: Dec 22 2009 8:46 am
- City, State: Vista, CA
Re: Improving the visual accuracy of tracks via editing ...
I do the same thing as big_load... The tools in Mapsource aren't wonderful but they get the job done. The last track I submitted (Boden Canyon, CA) took some cleaning up. I had some signal bounce-back from canyons, lost signal issues due to tree over-hangs, etc. The original track looked like total doo doo. I could have finessed the final track a bit more but it will do the job for most folks... There are other programs available that will help you edit map data but I haven't tried them (TOPO! is a pretty good one I hear...).
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes

