Catalina bighorns are gone, but explanatory signs live on

Hiking Related – Not Trail Specific

Moderator: HAZ - Moderators

 Linked Guides none
 Linked Area, etc none
User avatar
Jeffshadows
Guides: 28 | Official Routes: 7
Triplogs Last: 4,047 d | RS: 0
Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: 4,205 d
Joined: Jan 30 2008 8:46 am
City, State: Old Pueblo

Catalina bighorns are gone, but explanatory signs live on

Post by Jeffshadows »

Signs at two popular trailheads north of Tucson tout a small herd of bighorn sheep in the Catalina Mountains - and they list hiking restrictions to protect the animals.

Only one problem: The herd apparently has died out.

The signs and restrictions remain, but they apply to what might be described as "phantom bighorns."

"The Catalina population of bighorns is gone," said Jim Heffelfinger, a spokesman for the Arizona Game and Fish Department. "I haven't had any good reports of sheep from the herd up there for seven or eight years."

Heffelfinger said that means the resident herd - which once numbered more than 100 bighorns in the Pusch Ridge area on the southwestern side of the Catalinas - no longer exists. It's still possible that people might spot "transient" bighorns from other ranges from time to time.

A recent reported sighting involved a sheep with a yellow ear tag, Heffelfinger said. That indicates the animal might have been a transient from mountains near Superior, where bighorns have been fitted with yellow tags.

Heffelfinger said likely reasons for the demise of the Catalina herd include:

• Extensive urbanization around the base of Pusch Ridge, with streets and buildings taking over terrain ever nearer bighorn habitat.

• Hikers - especially hikers with dogs - who disturb sheep and "have a slow, pervasive influence on survival and reproduction."

• Heavy growth of brush, a result of former fire suppression policies, that makes bighorns vulnerable to predators such as mountain lions.

"The sheep didn't disappear all of a sudden," Heffelfinger said. "We just saw less and less and less over the years."

He said what turned out to be the last survey of bighorns in the Catalinas, conducted in 1997, found only one animal.

So what about those signs at the Finger Rock Canyon trailhead, at the northern end of Alvernon Way, and the Pima Canyon trailhead, on Magee Road east of First Avenue?

The signs state that "the bighorn herd in Pusch Ridge Wilderness represents the last remnant of herds" that once roamed several mountain ranges around Tucson.

"The Pusch Ridge herd is now in serious jeopardy," the signs say. "Less than 20 bighorns survive in the area."

Such information would appear to be misleading, at best, if nothing is left of the herd. Is it time to take down the signs and drop regulations that prohibit dogs and limit off-trail hiking?

Not yet, say officials of the Game and Fish Department and the U.S. Forest Service.

Heffelfinger and Forest Service spokeswoman Heidi Schewel said one reason for leaving the signs in place is that there's at least some chance that bighorns might be reintroduced into the Catalinas.

"We've been in discussions with Arizona Game and Fish about Pusch Ridge being a possible site" for transplanting bighorns from other parts of the state, Schewel said. "Leaving the signs and restrictions in place seemed like a good idea, given that there might be a reintroduction."

But a reintroduction wouldn't happen anytime soon, Heffelfinger said, because sufficient source populations from other sites aren't available now.

"And if they became available three or four years down the way, the Catalinas probably wouldn't be the first place we put sheep," Heffelfinger said. That's because transplanted animals would face the same conditions that apparently led to the demise of the original herd.

Heffelfinger acknowledged that leaving the inaccurate signs up indefinitely might not be a good idea.

"After a while, it becomes kind of meaningless," he said.

Meanwhile, tourist David Tzeutschler, preparing to take a walk on the Pima Canyon Trail last week with his 3-year-old son, Timothy, chose to take a hopeful approach.

"Maybe we'll see a bighorn," he said to Timothy as the two started up the trail.

On StarNet: Search our online database of Southern Arizona wildlife at

go.azstarnet.com/critters

Did you know

A herd of 50 to 75 bighorn sheep survives in the Silver Bell Mountains, northwest of Tucson, according to the Arizona Game and Fish Department.

Contact reporter Doug Kreutz at 573-4192 or dkreutz@azstarnet.com
AD-AVGVSTA-PER-ANGVSTA
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes Route Scout GPS Topo Mapper on the App Store Route Scout GPS Topo Mapper on Google Play
User avatar
te_wa
Guides: 3 | Official Routes: 0
Triplogs Last: 1,666 d | RS: 2
Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: 1,866 d
Joined: Aug 22 2003 9:16 pm
City, State: Mesa

Re: Hiking Ethics

Post by te_wa »

how much is Lamb nowadays? last i checked it was about $7 a pound and went fantastically with curried potatoes.
squirrel!
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes Route Scout GPS Topo Mapper on the App Store Route Scout GPS Topo Mapper on Google Play
User avatar
azbackpackr
Guides: 27 | Official Routes: 23
Triplogs Last: 77 d | RS: 0
Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: 770 d
Joined: Jan 21 2006 6:46 am
City, State: Eagar AZ

Re: Hiking Ethics

Post by azbackpackr »

Yeah. Squirrel is a lot cheaper.
There is a point of no return unremarked at the time in most lives. Graham Greene The Comedians
A clean house is a sign of a misspent life.
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes Route Scout GPS Topo Mapper on the App Store Route Scout GPS Topo Mapper on Google Play
User avatar
Jim
Guides: 73 | Official Routes: 36
Triplogs Last: 6 d | RS: 67
Water Reports 1Y: 10 | Last: 142 d
Joined: Sep 08 2006 8:14 pm

Re: Hiking Ethics

Post by Jim »

I know this restriction is not for trail use, so where does it apply to the west side of the Catalinas? It's been snowy lately, and cold, and sheep would go to lower elevations for food and to not freeze. Does the restriction apply to places that are up against developments?
🍭
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes Route Scout GPS Topo Mapper on the App Store Route Scout GPS Topo Mapper on Google Play
User avatar
SAMBA
Guides: 0 | Official Routes: 2
Triplogs Last: 2,344 d | RS: 0
Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: never
Joined: Oct 02 2009 12:59 pm
City, State: Tucson, AZ

Re: Hiking Ethics

Post by SAMBA »

@Jim_H

"I know this restriction is not for trail use" provided you stay WITHIN 400' of an official trail. Ergo, most bushwhacking, canyon scrambling, and off-trail peaks are off-limits from Jan.1st - Apr. 1st.
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes Route Scout GPS Topo Mapper on the App Store Route Scout GPS Topo Mapper on Google Play
User avatar
Jim
Guides: 73 | Official Routes: 36
Triplogs Last: 6 d | RS: 67
Water Reports 1Y: 10 | Last: 142 d
Joined: Sep 08 2006 8:14 pm

Re: Hiking Ethics

Post by Jim »

So all the Pusch is considered part of it, but you never really see any enforcement. If the animals are gone, there is not even any sense in it. If they disappeared due to habitat loss, not hikers trespassing into calving grounds, there is almost no reason to have it.

I question the feasibility of reintroducing them. They probably became an isolated meta-population, and would need continual human management. It would make more sense to better manage more viable populations, rather than attempt to have one requiring a high level of supervision in the Catalinas. I would rather see resources spent on wolf management and restoring greater areas of higher elevation forest to more natural state, to facilitate a higher level of return on investment. What about any BHP in the other sky islands with lower development levels at their base? Maybe the focus should be on effective Chihuahua or Dragoon BHS management? That is just me, though. At the very least, I would rather see money spent on thinning and additional fire use in the Catalinas, to prevent another fire as was experienced in 2003.
🍭
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes Route Scout GPS Topo Mapper on the App Store Route Scout GPS Topo Mapper on Google Play
User avatar
SAMBA
Guides: 0 | Official Routes: 2
Triplogs Last: 2,344 d | RS: 0
Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: never
Joined: Oct 02 2009 12:59 pm
City, State: Tucson, AZ

Re: Hiking Ethics

Post by SAMBA »

@Jim_H
Yo JH,

Would I be exposing my lefty (socialist?) leanings were I to suggest having the state/county invoke eminent domain on ALL property east of Oracle Road and north of River Road. Me thinks that would go a long way to improving the BHS habitat.
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes Route Scout GPS Topo Mapper on the App Store Route Scout GPS Topo Mapper on Google Play
User avatar
Mick
Guides: 1 | Official Routes: 0
Triplogs Last: 2,345 d | RS: 0
Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: never
Joined: Jun 05 2003 9:18 pm
City, State: Scottsdale, AZ

Re: Hiking Ethics

Post by Mick »

Sheep Worrier :scared:
AZMick
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes Route Scout GPS Topo Mapper on the App Store Route Scout GPS Topo Mapper on Google Play
User avatar
joebartels
Guides: 264 | Official Routes: 226
Triplogs Last: 5 d | RS: 1960
Water Reports 1Y: 14 | Last: 8 d
Joined: Nov 20 1996 12:00 pm

Re: Catalina bighorns are gone, but explanatory signs live on

Post by joebartels »

catbig2.png
Last edited by joebartels on Feb 28 2018 8:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
- joe
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes Route Scout GPS Topo Mapper on the App Store Route Scout GPS Topo Mapper on Google Play
Post Reply

Return to “General”