I have noticed the voice reported data when finishing a track is different than what is reported once it is uploaded to RE.
Today I recorded a track that was voice reported as 1002' of AEG at the end of the track.
When I uploaded it to RE it is showing 839' AEG.
The mileage is usually off as well but I cannot remember the specifics.
Comments?
WV-Mike
RS - Reported track data differences
Moderator: HAZ - Moderators
Linked Guides none
Linked Area, etc none
-
WVMikeGuides: 0 | Official Routes: 0Triplogs Last: 1,455 d | RS: 3Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: never
- Joined: Nov 29 2015 7:56 am
- City, State: Tucson, AZ
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
joebartelsGuides: 264 | Official Routes: 226Triplogs Last: 5 d | RS: 1960Water Reports 1Y: 14 | Last: 8 d
- Joined: Nov 20 1996 12:00 pm
Re: Reported track data differences
@WVMike
When you save or post from Route Scout to HAZ it auto syncs elevation to 1/3 arc National Elevation Data which is typically more accurate. Mileage shouldn't change much if any from RS to HAZ.
When you save or post from Route Scout to HAZ it auto syncs elevation to 1/3 arc National Elevation Data which is typically more accurate. Mileage shouldn't change much if any from RS to HAZ.
- joe
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
WVMikeGuides: 0 | Official Routes: 0Triplogs Last: 1,455 d | RS: 3Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: never
- Joined: Nov 29 2015 7:56 am
- City, State: Tucson, AZ
Re: Reported track data differences
Thanks Joe.joebartels wrote:When you save or post from Route Scout to HAZ it auto syncs elevation to 1/3 arc National Elevation Data which is typically more accurate. Mileage shouldn't change much if any from RS to HAZ.
I am diggin' RS and RE!
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
rcorfmanGuides: 1 | Official Routes: 4Triplogs Last: 438 d | RS: 2Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: 889 d
- Joined: Oct 17 2008 11:19 pm
- City, State: Phoenix, AZ
- Contact:
Re: RS - Reported track data differences
If I felt up to it, I would argue that that probably isn't the case as far as AEG goes. It will be more accurate for the current elevation since that is based off a mathematical model, but for calculating how much a person goes up and down, I have my doubts.joebartels wrote:When you save or post from Route Scout to HAZ it auto syncs elevation to 1/3 arc National Elevation Data which is typically more accurate. Mileage shouldn't change much if any from RS to HAZ.
Go find a LonelyCache
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
joebartelsGuides: 264 | Official Routes: 226Triplogs Last: 5 d | RS: 1960Water Reports 1Y: 14 | Last: 8 d
- Joined: Nov 20 1996 12:00 pm
Re: RS - Reported track data differences
Elevation Sync from RS to HAZ is now off. Five or so years ago, elevation on smartphones was horrible. Now seems better than NED coordinate models, especially near cliffs and in canyons. Unlikely needed but you can still manually sync on HAZ if desired.
Note, AEG won't be an exact match. There will be a slight difference in AEG on RS vs HAZ. Either a floating point difference or coding variance limits.
Tested RS +Add Route & RS +Add triplog
RS save to RC seemed fine in one test but I didn't dig into it
Note, AEG won't be an exact match. There will be a slight difference in AEG on RS vs HAZ. Either a floating point difference or coding variance limits.
Tested RS +Add Route & RS +Add triplog
RS save to RC seemed fine in one test but I didn't dig into it
- joe
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes

