Question about Google Earth elevation profiles
Moderator: HAZ - Moderators
Linked Guides none
Linked Area, etc none
-
WVMikeGuides: 0 | Official Routes: 0Triplogs Last: 1,455 d | RS: 3Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: never
- Joined: Nov 29 2015 7:56 am
- City, State: Tucson, AZ
Question about Google Earth elevation profiles
Greetings,
There is a Google Earth elevation profile here: (not SPAM)!
http://epicroadtrips.us/GE_EP/
Do any of the elevation stats reflect the accumulated elevation gain?
Thanks,
-Mike
There is a Google Earth elevation profile here: (not SPAM)!
http://epicroadtrips.us/GE_EP/
Do any of the elevation stats reflect the accumulated elevation gain?
Thanks,
-Mike
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
joebartelsGuides: 264 | Official Routes: 226Triplogs Last: 5 d | RS: 1960Water Reports 1Y: 14 | Last: 8 d
- Joined: Nov 20 1996 12:00 pm
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
WVMikeGuides: 0 | Official Routes: 0Triplogs Last: 1,455 d | RS: 3Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: never
- Joined: Nov 29 2015 7:56 am
- City, State: Tucson, AZ
Re: Question about Google Earth elevation profiles
Hi Joe,joe bartels wrote:not that I see
More info:
The El profile is for the La Milagrosa / Agua Caliente Canyon Loop.
See: http://hikearizona.com/decoder.php?ZTN= ... 2d77a2c1ae
It lists the elevation gain as 970'.
Google Earth says 1604'
A big difference. This made me wonder if the GE el gain was accumulated.
-Mike
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
joebartelsGuides: 264 | Official Routes: 226Triplogs Last: 5 d | RS: 1960Water Reports 1Y: 14 | Last: 8 d
- Joined: Nov 20 1996 12:00 pm
Re: Question about Google Earth elevation profiles
duh, let me put my glasses on
yes!
it looks like GE gain on that profile is accumulated
The one on the description is an old track with few points. I'll update. 1500 ish looks more correct.
thx
yes!
it looks like GE gain on that profile is accumulated
The one on the description is an old track with few points. I'll update. 1500 ish looks more correct.
thx
- joe
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
WVMikeGuides: 0 | Official Routes: 0Triplogs Last: 1,455 d | RS: 3Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: never
- Joined: Nov 29 2015 7:56 am
- City, State: Tucson, AZ
Re: Question about Google Earth elevation profiles
Grrr! I missed this on at http://hikearizona.com/decoder.php?ZTN= ... 2d77a2c1ae
"1,302 aeg"
This is about 300' less than the GE figure which I suspect may be AEG.
Anyone no for sure if this is the case?
Thanks,
-Mike
"1,302 aeg"
This is about 300' less than the GE figure which I suspect may be AEG.
Anyone no for sure if this is the case?
Thanks,
-Mike
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
WVMikeGuides: 0 | Official Routes: 0Triplogs Last: 1,455 d | RS: 3Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: never
- Joined: Nov 29 2015 7:56 am
- City, State: Tucson, AZ
Re: Question about Google Earth elevation profiles
Thanks Joe.joe bartels wrote:duh, let me put my glasses on
yes!
it looks like GE gain on that profile is accumulated
The one on the description is an old track with few points. I'll update. 1550 ish looks more correct.
thx
I will look for the update.
-Mike
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
chumleyGuides: 94 | Official Routes: 241Triplogs Last: 5 d | RS: 65Water Reports 1Y: 78 | Last: 7 d
- Joined: Sep 18 2002 8:59 am
- City, State: Tempe, AZ
Re: Question about Google Earth elevation profiles
Max elevation: 3758
Min elevation: 2789
Difference: 969
Elev Gain listed at: 1604
Seems like it is adding 635 feet of gain for something.
HAZ synced stats for the route are for 961 total and 1317 aeg.
So I assume google's 1604 is their aeg. But they probably use a different topo sync database than HAZ does.
Min elevation: 2789
Difference: 969
Elev Gain listed at: 1604
Seems like it is adding 635 feet of gain for something.
HAZ synced stats for the route are for 961 total and 1317 aeg.
So I assume google's 1604 is their aeg. But they probably use a different topo sync database than HAZ does.
I'm not sure what my spirit animal is, but I'm confident it has rabies.
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
joebartelsGuides: 264 | Official Routes: 226Triplogs Last: 5 d | RS: 1960Water Reports 1Y: 14 | Last: 8 d
- Joined: Nov 20 1996 12:00 pm
Re: Question about Google Earth elevation profiles
updated to 1440
I would need the actual track file being used on GE to determine more...
I would need the actual track file being used on GE to determine more...
- joe
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
LindaAnnGuides: 110 | Official Routes: 110Triplogs Last: 1 d | RS: 1789Water Reports 1Y: 18 | Last: 14 d
- Joined: Dec 24 2007 6:49 am
- City, State: Ahwatukee, AZ
- Contact:
Re: Question about Google Earth elevation profiles
I save all my gpx files in Google Earth. The AEG it comes up with runs high about 99% of the time, so I don't really trust it. Plus, if you look at the elevation profile of the same gpx file in GE on different sized computer monitors, it will give you different mileage & AEG. Not kidding. I've tried this on three different computers in my house, all the numbers were slightly different.
Stop crying and just go do the hike.
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
chumleyGuides: 94 | Official Routes: 241Triplogs Last: 5 d | RS: 65Water Reports 1Y: 78 | Last: 7 d
- Joined: Sep 18 2002 8:59 am
- City, State: Tempe, AZ
Re: Question about Google Earth elevation profiles
@lindaagm
This shatters my longstanding belief that Google knows everything.
This shatters my longstanding belief that Google knows everything.

I'm not sure what my spirit animal is, but I'm confident it has rabies.
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
SAMBAGuides: 0 | Official Routes: 2Triplogs Last: 2,344 d | RS: 0Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: never
- Joined: Oct 02 2009 12:59 pm
- City, State: Tucson, AZ
Re: Question about Google Earth elevation profiles
Which hike are you talking about, the hike in the canyons, or the hike along the rims of the two canyons? My, SAMBA (aka LaFong) canyons hike, http://hikearizona.com/map.php?GPS=9987, was done in the canyons proper and had 972 aeg, whereas the "official route", http://hikearizona.com/map.php?GPS=31166, is a rim hike with a 1439 aeg. Could this be the source of the perceived discrepancy?
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
joebartelsGuides: 264 | Official Routes: 226Triplogs Last: 5 d | RS: 1960Water Reports 1Y: 14 | Last: 8 d
- Joined: Nov 20 1996 12:00 pm
Re: Question about Google Earth elevation profiles
Wendy just posted the loop with more points of data from RS. The description one, which is the rim hike, definitely looks in 1450 to 1500 range max.
- joe
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
big_loadGuides: 0 | Official Routes: 1Triplogs Last: 594 d | RS: 3Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: 2,483 d
- Joined: Oct 28 2003 11:20 am
- City, State: Andover, NJ
Re: Question about Google Earth elevation profiles
It all depends on your definition of where everything ends and everything else begins.chumley wrote:@lindaagm
This shatters my longstanding belief that Google knows everything.
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
SredfieldGuides: 4 | Official Routes: 4Triplogs Last: 49 d | RS: 0Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: 503 d
- Joined: Sep 08 2002 1:07 pm
- City, State: Ahwatukee, AZ
Re: Question about Google Earth elevation profiles
We found very wide discrepancy in elevation profiles and totals depending on which program you used and even between versions of the same application.
Shawn
The bear went over the mountain to see what he could see.
The bear went over the mountain to see what he could see.
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
WVMikeGuides: 0 | Official Routes: 0Triplogs Last: 1,455 d | RS: 3Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: never
- Joined: Nov 29 2015 7:56 am
- City, State: Tucson, AZ
Re: Question about Google Earth elevation profiles
I downloaded this one:joe bartels wrote:updated to 1440
I would need the actual track file being used on GE to determine more...
http://hikearizona.com/decoder.php?ZTN= ... 2d77a2c1ae
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes


-
WVMikeGuides: 0 | Official Routes: 0Triplogs Last: 1,455 d | RS: 3Water Reports 1Y: 0 | Last: never
- Joined: Nov 29 2015 7:56 am
- City, State: Tucson, AZ
Re: Question about Google Earth elevation profiles
After looking at your two tracks I think we hiked the "official" route.SAMBA wrote:Which hike are you talking about, the hike in the canyons, or the hike along the rims of the two canyons? My, SAMBA (aka LaFong) canyons hike, http://hikearizona.com/map.php?GPS=9987, was done in the canyons proper and had 972 aeg, whereas the "official route", http://hikearizona.com/map.php?GPS=31166, is a rim hike with a 1439 aeg. Could this be the source of the perceived discrepancy?
It was well worn the entire way.
The trail started at a gate, meandered up past an old stone house on the left, climbed and then crossed the creek, climbed more to the intersection of the trail which comes down from the Molino Basin Campground area. (http://epicroadtrips.us/Miligrosa%2011-15.gtm/)
The trail then wound down to the creek. We followed cairns down the creek and then picked up a trail on the left and then up to a ridge and then finally down a steep switchback to the creek and the trail we came in on.
I have on been there once a coupla months ago and the details are foggy.
Thanks,
-Mike/Al
contribute to this member driven resource
ie: RS > Save/Share after hikes

